Connect with us

Published

on

Gaza Crisis: U.S., Russia Abstain As Security Council Adopts Key Resolution—The UN Security Council on Friday adopted a resolution on the ongoing crisis with 13 votes in favour and the U.S. and Russia abstaining.

The resolution, among others demands immediate, safe and unhindered delivery of humanitarian assistance at scale directly to the Palestinian civilian population throughout the Gaza strip.

Speaking, Riyad Mansour, Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine, said the Security Concill first met to address the crisis when hundreds of Palestinians had been killed by Israel.

“The Council is now meeting after over 20,000 Palestinians have been killed, almost half of them children and 60,000 wounded, and two million Palestinians have been forcefully displaced.

“It is meeting as homes, shelters, schools and hospitals have been destroyed, and as hunger and disease are spreading like wildfire,” he noted.

He added that Palestinians had been facing death every single day for 75 days.

He stated that the Arab and Organisation for Islamic Cooperation (OIC) groups, with support of some UN Member States had been mobilising for three objectives, an immediate ceasefire, humanitarian assistance at scale, and no forced displacement.

“We meet today as part of the continuous efforts to advance these goals,” he said.

Mansour said, “inhumane and criminal Israeli siege” and the use of vital humanitarian “as a method of war” must end immediately.

“What we are dealing with is an attempt at the destruction of our people and their displacement forever from their land,” he said.

He added: “This is Israel’s goal, its true objective, no future for Palestinians in Palestine.

“That is why it is bombing everyone and everything.”

He described the resolution as a step in the right direction, noting that it must be implemented and must be accompanied by massive pressure for an immediate ceasefire.

Russian Ambassador, Alekseyevich Nebenzia, recalled the amendment proposed by his delegation and said the vote on it was a moment of truth.

He expressed regret that the Security Council did not find the courage to support at least the minimum call for an end to the violence in Gaza, and it instead signed up for a “license to kill” Palestinian civilians.

“This is a tragic moment for the Council, not a moment of triumph for multilateral diplomacy, but rather one of gross unprincipled blackmail and open scorn on the part of Washington for the suffering of Palestinians and the hopes of the global community,” he said.

He noted that if the draft resolution had not been supported by a number of Arab States, Russia would certainly have vetoed it.

He added that Arab States are able to take decisions and bear responsibility, and underscored “categorical” disagreement with the content on the resolution.

Ambassador Nebenzia also emphasised that the Security Council’s clear demand for a full ceasefire remained an imperative, and that without it, the implementation of Council decisions in Gaza was simply impossible.

U.S. Ambassador, Thomas-Greenfield, was the first to speak after the vote, describing the resolution as “a glimmer of hope amongst a sea of unimaginable suffering.”

She said since the start of the conflict, the U.S. had worked tirelessly to alleviate the humanitarian crisis, to get lifesaving assistance into Gaza and to get hostages out of the enclave.

She added that the country also pushed for the protection of innocent civilians and humanitarian workers, and to work towards a lasting peace.

“Today this Council made clear that all hostages must be released immediately and unconditionally and that humanitarian groups must be able to access hostages, including for medical visits,” she said.

The Council made it clear that all parties must respect international humanitarian laws and that civilian, humanitarian and UN facilities, as well as humanitarian personnel and medical personnel, must be protected.

While encouraged that the Council spoke out on the humanitarian crisis, Thomas-Greenfield said the U.S. was “appalled” that it was again unable to condemn the horrific terrorist attacks committed by Hamas  on  Oct. 7.

She said her country did not support the proposal by Russia.

“We believe the humanitarian resolution before us calls for urgent steps to immediately allow safe, unhindered, and expanded humanitarian access and to create the conditions for a sustainable cessation of hostilities.

“This is a strong step forward,” she added.

0Shares
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Breaking

JUST IN: FG Cracks Down on Honorary Degree Abuse, Bans Use of ‘Dr’ Title

Published

on

FG Cracks Down on Honorary Degree Abuse

JUST IN: FG Cracks Down on Honorary Degree Abuse, Bans Use of ‘Dr’ Title—-Government says honorary doctorate holders who present themselves as academic doctors risk legal and reputational consequences

The Federal Government has announced a nationwide ban on the use of the “Dr” title by recipients of honorary doctorate degrees in official, academic, and professional settings.

The directive was unveiled on Wednesday by the Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa, during a briefing with State House correspondents at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

Speaking alongside the Minister of State for Education, Suwaiba Ahmad, Alausa disclosed that the Federal Executive Council (FEC) had approved a new uniform policy regulating the award and usage of honorary degrees by Nigerian universities.

According to the minister, the move is intended to curb what the government describes as years of abuse, politicisation, and commercialisation of honorary academic awards.

“The recent trend we’ve seen with the award of honorary degrees has revealed a growing abuse and politicisation of this academic privilege,” Alausa said.

He noted that honorary awards have increasingly been used for political patronage, financial influence, and recognition of serving public office holders—practices he described as inconsistent with the ethical principles guiding honorary degrees.

Under the newly approved policy, recipients of honorary doctorates are no longer permitted to prefix “Dr” to their names. Instead, they must clearly indicate the honorary nature of the award by placing the designation after their names.

For example, recipients may use formats such as Chief Louis Clark, D.Lit. (Honoris Causa) or Mrs Miriam Adamu, LL.D. Hons.

Alausa stressed that misrepresenting honorary degrees as academically earned qualifications will now be regarded as academic fraud and may attract both legal and reputational consequences.

The government also introduced stricter rules on the categories of honorary degrees Nigerian universities are allowed to confer. Institutions will now be limited to only four honorary degree types:

  • Doctor of Laws (LL.D)
  • Doctor of Letters (D.Lit)
  • Doctor of Science (D.Sc)
  • Doctor of Humanities (D.Arts)

In addition, universities that do not operate active PhD programmes will no longer be allowed to award honorary doctorates.

The policy is expected to significantly affect public figures, politicians, entertainers, religious leaders, and business personalities who commonly adopt the “Dr” title after receiving honorary recognitions.

0Shares
Continue Reading

Sports

BREAKING: PSG Set Up Arsenal Champions League Final After 6-5 Aggregate Win Over Bayern Munich

Published

on

PSG Set Up Arsenal Champions League Final

BREAKING: PSG Set Up Arsenal Champions League Final After 6-5 Aggregate Win Over Bayern Munich—-Reigning European champions Paris Saint-Germain have secured their place in yet another UEFA Champions League final after overcoming Bayern Munich in a fiercely contested semi-final clash.

Paris Saint-Germain have booked their place in the 2026 UEFA Champions League final after edging Bayern Munich 6-5 on aggregate in a dramatic semi-final clash.

The decisive moment came early in the second leg, when Ballon d’Or holder Ousmane Dembélé fired home from close range after being picked out by Khvicha Kvaratskhelia, giving PSG a crucial lead that ultimately proved to be the winner.

Despite the fast start, the game soon became defined as much by controversy as by clear-cut chances. Bayern were left frustrated after Nuno Mendes appeared to handle the ball while already on a booking, but the referee opted against issuing a second yellow card.

Further anger followed when another potential handball incident involving João Neves went unpunished, with officials ruling that the ball had deflected off a teammate in the build-up—therefore not meeting the criteria for a penalty.

Bayern, managed by Vincent Kompany, dominated large periods of the match and created several opportunities. Michael Olise and Jamal Musiala both came close, while goalkeeper Matvéi Safonov was called into action multiple times.

The German side eventually found the net through Harry Kane in stoppage time, but it proved too little, too late as PSG held on to secure their place in the final.

The result extends Bayern’s wait for another European title to six years, while PSG now have the opportunity to win back-to-back Champions League trophies, just a year after claiming their first.

Attention now turns to the final on May 30, where PSG will face Arsenal. The showdown promises high stakes, with either a historic first Champions League title for Arsenal or consecutive triumphs for the French giants on the line.

0Shares
Continue Reading

Trending

0Shares