Connect with us

Published

on

Interest Groups Vow To Resist Lagos State Assembly Speaker’s Move To Illegally Substitute Names Of Winners Of APC Primaries—-Interest groups have warned the incumbent Speaker of Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa to stay clear from substituting names of winners in the recent primary elections in Lagos State with the names of his cronies as candidates. The groups vowed to mobilise Lagosians for justice to reign if the alleged plans by the Lagos State House of Assembly Speaker sails through.

To this end, a Lagos based civil rights movement and democracy watch collaborated with another group known as ‘Progressive Lagos for Justice and Fair Play’ to outrightly condemn in strongest terms the alleged post election activities of the Speaker, Rt Hon. Obasa

The Group has threaten to expose the Speaker to the leadership of the All Progressive Congress (APC) Lagos state, the state Governor, Mr. Babajide Sanwo-Olu, the Governor’s Adversary Council, and all party stakeholders on the plan by the Speaker of the Lagos state House of Assembly to substitute names for already acclaimed winners in the just concluded Party Congresses as candidates for the State Assembly election coming up next year.

In another joint press statements signed by Wasiu Adebanjo and Comrade Kunle Fadipe and Latifat Odumosu which red in part, “We wish to appeal to every Progress Lagosians, Democrats and to all it may concern to urgently rescue the democratic process in Lagos state Assembly from the activities of the incumbent Speaker of Lagos State House of Assembly Rt. Hon. Obasa against changing the names of successful winners announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)

The group wondered why the Speaker who is lawyer and a law makers should throw caution to the wind and subvert the will of the masses as exercised through the recent party Congress two weeks ago where some of the candidates that emerged victoriously and being secretly changed to favour about 7 of his cronies against the names of those who have been duly declared winners in the Congress.

It will be in the interest of justice and fair play that Rt. Hon Obasa respect the rights of the Lagosians and their rule of engagement. If the All Progressive Congress Party at the national level can respect the process leading to a widely acknowledged credible election for it’s Presidential candidate through the emergence of His Excellency Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Lagos state Assembly should be allowed by Hon Obasa to run on its own and allow the status quo to suffice.

Hon Obasa should not make himself the poster boy that personifies a greedy and selfish democrat having been in power getting to 3 decades and now exercising such power on fraudulent partway to reward loyalists and destroy excellence with mediocrity.

Rt Hon Obasa is no doubt making a mockery of our electoral process here in a state know for excellence, thereby becoming a complicit in an effort to foist deception to the public with defies honesty, transparency and good faith.

A person with principle and conviction will not be a party to such an unethical arrangement. If he does, it demonstrates his low regard of the people and he should not enjoy their trust.

He has not shown any different from a nuisance candidate who is devoid of any intention to serve our people but to commit an undue advantage over, or wreck the chances of, political opponents.

“It’s high time to review the law or regulation allowing substitution of candidates except those in cases of death or disqualification; otherwise, there will be no honesty and fair play in our elections.

“It is making a mockery of the Lagos APC Congresses and knowingly becoming complicit in an effort to foist fake and perpetrate deception to the public which will never stand no matter his efforts.

“It is disheartening that such action which defy transparency and good faith will come from the Speaker one of the biggest beneficiary of democracy and a that is supposed radiate good principle of rule of engagement at all times against such unethical arrangement.

“We as a group will mobilize Lagosians against this thrust, which questions the rights of the people of Lagos State and brought it under attack”, the group said.

0Shares
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

News

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy Light-Up Ofada Rice Day 7.0

Published

on

Ofada Rice Day 7.0

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy Light-Up Ofada Rice Day 7.0

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy and host of leading Nigerian Artistes and Comedians light-up the 7th edition of the largest indigenous food festival, Ofada Rice Day- themed Eko Dun Joor. The event, which was held at the Muri Okunola park, Victoria island Lagos had over 8,000 attendees.

 

The festival, which showcased the richness of Nigerian culture, food, and entertainment, was a convergence of leading brands, including Pocketmoni which was the headline sponsor, Goldberg, Maltina, Fatgbems Group, Betnaija, Action Bitters and other partners such as Golden Penny, MTN, Pepsi, Arthill Studio and others created back-to-back engagement with the various strata of audience.

 

Dignitaries from the Canadian Deputy High Commission, Federal and Lagos State Government top officials, leading kings in Southwest graced the event, also featured electrifying performances by top Nigerian artistes, including Haruna Ishola, Reminisce, Dotun, Mide, Awesome band, Elijah, SquardOne, Alex Osho, Lolo, Hyenana, Gbenga Adeyinka among others.

Food vendors from across Ogun state such as Ikene, Itoko, Iperu, showcased their culinary expertise, offering diverse delicacies that highlighted the versatility of Ofada rice.

 

The event received accolades from key stakeholders. Ms. Abisola Olusanya, Lagos State Commissioner for Agriculture, lauded Ofadaboy for its dedication to promoting Ofada rice and preserving Nigerian food traditions and leading the dirty December conversation with superlative show for seven years.

Similarly, Dr. Abisoye Fagade, Director-General of the National Institute of Hospitality and Tourism, praised the brand’s commitment to showcasing Nigerian cuisine on a global stage.

 

Speaking at the festival, Tobi Fletcher, Creative Director of Ofadaboy, and Oyinda Fletcher, Chief Operating Officer, expressed their gratitude to attendees and partners. “This milestone is a testament to our passion for promoting Nigerian cuisine and culture. We are excited about the future and look forward to continuing this journey,” said Tobi Fletcher.

As a leading name in food and hospitality, Ofadaboy operates a thriving restaurant, offers top-notch catering services, and produces a range of premium food products, including packaged Ofada rice and spices. The brand has solidified its reputation as a champion of Nigerian food and culture, earning widespread recognition for its innovative efforts in showcasing the richness of local cuisine.

 

0Shares
Continue Reading

Business

FINANCIAL CRISIS!!! Access Bank in Turmoil As Court Freezes ₦29bn At CBN, Exposing Deep Legal Trouble

Published

on

Access Bank in Turmoil As Court Freezes ₦29bn At CBN

FINANCIAL CRISIS!!! Access Bank in Turmoil As Court Freezes ₦29bn At CBN, Triggering Anxiety Among Shareholders

 

In a stunning twist that has sent shockwaves through Nigeria’s financial sector, Access Bank has been thrust into the spotlight after a court ordered the attachment of a staggering ₦29 billion from its accounts with the Central Bank of Nigeria. The dramatic ruling linked to a long-running judgment debt has ignited fresh concerns among investors, rattled shareholders, and sparked whispers across the banking industry.

At the Federal high court sitting in Lagos;issued an Order attaching the funds of ACCESS BANK in the custody of the Central Bank of Nigeria in satisfaction of the Judgment of the Court of Appeal in CA/LAG/CV/1215/2023 gala Construction Co, Ltd & 2 Ors versus Access Bank Plc, on the 10th day of June 2025, in the sum of N28,824,851,515.57 being relief sought in the Applicants’ Counterclaim dated 26% October 2022, together with compounded interest of 32% per annum commencing from the 3rd day of October 2025 till total liquidation of the Judgment sum.

The ruling of the federal high court arose from a case started at Lagos high court sometimes in 2005 between Access Bank Plc versus IGALA Construction company Ltd and two others namely Mr.C.A Khouzam and Reverend (Mrs) Mary Akinlaja

Access bank file it’s claim the defendants,IGALA Construction & 2 Others filed a defence and counter-claim,the case was prosecuted to conclusion.

In the judgment delivered on June 26,2023 the presiding Judge of the Lagos high court S.I.Solanke granted the claims of the Claimants
The Court equally granted the Counter-Claim of the Defendants/Counter-Clamants partially.

However,the Defendant/Counter-Claimants lodged Appeal No. CA/LAG/CV/12 15/2023 Igala Construction Co. Ltd & 2 Ors v Access Bank P/c against the judgement of the High Court of Lagos. Access Bank Plc did not appeal the grant of the Defendants/Counter-Claimants’ Counter-Claim.

The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, on June 10, 2023 and set aside the judgment entered in favour of the Access bank and affirmed the Counterclaim which the trial court partially granted and, in its stead, granted the entirety of the Counter-Claim in the following terms:

a. A Declaration that the 1st Defendant/Counterclaimant is entitled to the sum of N27,595,152.40 (admitted by the Claimant in its letter dated 20th January 2004 erroneously dated 20th January, 2003 as being due and payable by the Claimant to the 1st Defendant) together with compounded interest at the rate of 24% per annum, commencing from the 1st of April, 2003 until total liquidation.

b. An order of the Court on the Claimant/Defendant to the Counterclaim to pay the said sum of N27, 595, 152.40 (admitted by the Claimant in its letter dated 20th January 2004 erroneously dated 20th January, 2003 as being due and payable by the Claimant) to the lst
Defendant) together with compounded interest at the rte of 24% per annum, commencing the 1st of April 2003 until total liquidation.

C. In addition, the 1st and 2nd Defendants counter Claimants also claim a penalty of 100% of the said amount of N27,595, 152.40 (admitted by the Claimant in its letter dated 20th January 2004 erroneously dated 20th January, 2003 as Being due and payable by the Claimant to the 1st Defendant) together with compounded interest at the rate of 24% per annum, commencing the 1st April, 2003 until total liquidation pursuant to Section 3.2.4(g) of the Central Rank of Nigeria Monetary Policy Circular 37 of 2/1/04,

d. Compound interest on (b) and (c) above (pursuant to the Central Rank of Nigeria Monetary Policy Circular 37 of 2/1/04) at the rate of 32% per annum commencing Ist April 2003, up to the date of judgment and thereafter at the same rate until total liquidation, the Claimants having denied the 1st Defendant/Counterclaimant herein the use and benefit to its fund (A27, 595, 152.40 (admitted by the Claimant in its letter dated 20th
January 2004 erroneously dated 20th January, 2003),

e. The sum of N300 Million as damages for the deliberate malicious and libelous publication made in the written instruction given by the
Claimant/Defendant to Counter-Claim to its Solicitors, Messers F.O. Fagbohungbe & CO. and the P.M.Newspaper of 7th December, 2005 both of which have disparaged, embarrassed and brought the names of the Counter-claimants into disrepute.

f. The Cost of N100 Million being the Solicitors’ fee in defending the Claim by the Claimant and prosecuting the Counter-claimants

Q The filing of the present application in thie Honourable Court followed a
subsequent review of the combined legal import of Section 287 (2) of the 1999 Constitution, Section 83 of the Sheriff and Civil Process Act 2004,

 

The professional services: of Motunrayo Popoola Aishat – a Chartered Accountant with ICAN Membership No: MB063815 to compute the judgement debt awarded in favour of the the judgment Creditors/Applicants by the Court of Appeal.
As at the 10th of June, 2025, when the Court of Appeal delivered its Judgment, the computation received from the above named Chartered Accountant on the 3rd of July 2025 showed the outstanding Judgment debt.

 

By the provision of Section 3.2.4 (g) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Monetary Policy Circular 37 of 2/1/04, the ist Judgment Creditor/Applicant is entitled to the refund of N27,595,152.40 admitted by the Judgment Debtor in its letter dated 20th January 2004 erroneously dated 20th January 2003 as being due and payable by the Judgment Debtor to the 1st Judgment Creditor together with compounded interest at the rate of 32 percent per annum (which was what the Judgement Debtor charged the Applicants) commencing 1st April 2003 until total liquidation. 19.In addition, the Judgment Creditors are also entitled to a penalty of 100% above sum, pursuant to Section 3.2.4 (g) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Monetary Policy Circular 37 of 2/1/04, together with compounded interest at the rate of 32 percent per annum commencing ist April 2003 until total liquidation.

It will be in the interest of justice to grant the relief sought by the Judgment Creditors/Applicants in this Application
Consequently,the Judgement creditors urge the court to issue an order attaching the funds of judgement Debtor Access bank in the custody of central bank of Nigeria in satisfaction of the.

Judgment of the Court of Appeal in CA/LAG/CV/1215/2023 Igala Construction Co. Ltd & 2 Ors V Access Bank Ple, delivered on the 10th day of June 2025, which substituted the Judgment of the High Court of Lagos State dated 26th June 2023 in the sum of N28,824,851,515.57 being relief d in the Applicant’s Counterclaim dated 26th October 2022, together with compounded interest of 32% per annum commencing from the 3rd day of October 2025 till total liquidation of the judgment sum.

granted, it does not preclude the judgement creditor from taking steps, It desires to reap the fruits of his judgement. coming from the foregoing, on the strength of the evidence before the court as contained in the affidavit and documentary exhibits of the Applicants, there is merit in the instant application. The Applicants are entitled to the reliefs on the face of the application.

0Shares
Continue Reading

Trending

0Shares