Connect with us
Dr. ABC Orjiakor Over Alleged $101m Debt

JUST IN: Court Adjourns Further Hearing Of Bankruptcy Suit Against Dr. ABC Orjiakor Over Alleged $101m Debt

More Videos

Published

on

JUST IN: Court Adjourns Further Hearing Of Bankruptcy Suit Against Dr. ABC Orjiakor Over Alleged $101m Debt—-Further proceedings in bankruptcy suit filed against Dr. Ambrose B. C. Orjiakor, before a Federal High Court, Lagos, over alleged inability to pay the debt of $101m USD, has been adjourned to July 23.

The presiding judge, Justice Deinde Dipeolu, fixed the date at the instance of the alleged debtor, Dr. Orjiakor, through his lawyer, Anthony Ndigbe (SAN), who pleaded for more time to settle the matter out of court.

Other Other respondents in the bankruptcy action marked FHC/L/BHK/08/2023 filed by Access Bank Plc are: Seplat Energy Plc; Helko Nigeria Limited; Neimeth International Pharmaceuticals Plc; Salvic Petroleum Resources Limited; Zebbra Energy Limited; Ordrec Group Limited; Helko Marine Services Limited; Berwick Nigeria Limited; Abbeycourt Petroleum Company Limited; Abbeycourt Energy Services Limited; Abbeycourt Company Limited and Pursley Resources Limited.

At the resumed hearing of the matter today, Mr. A. B. Ogunba (SAN) leading .. Ogunba appeared for the creditor, Access Bank Plc, Mr. Anthony Ndigbe (SAN) appeared for the alleged debtor, Dr. Orjiakor, Toyeeb Ipaye appeared for 2nd-5th and 7th to 12 respondents Bode Olanipekun (SAN) appeared for the 1st respondent, Seplat Energy Plc, Adam Wahab appeared for AMCON, Babatinde Olanipekun appeared for Zenith Bank Plc.

At today’s hearing, lawyer to the alleged debtor, Ndigbe (SAN) informed the court that the matter is listed for report of settlement, and that AMCON was directed by the court to coordinate the settlement meeting.

Responding, AMCON’s lawyer, Wahab told the court that his client received from the respondent a draft of the settlement which encompass the interest of the lenders in the suit.

He also told the court that he has made a comment on the draft to the respondent, while awaiting the reverse copy of the draft from the respondent.

In his respond, lawyer to the creditor, Ogunba (SAN) told the court that he was not aware of the draft copy of the settlement and that the draft has been drafted for the past four weeks.

Ogunba also informed the court of his motion on notice which he described as an ‘harmless’.

He therefore urged the court to allow him to move the motion.

However, Mr. Olanipekun (SAN), lawyer to Seplat, told the court he has a motion seeking out to strike the name of his client from the suit, on the basis that the court lacks jurisdiction over the first respondent.

In view of all parties’ submissions Dr. Orjiakor’s lawyer, Ndigbe (SAN) pleaded with the court for four weeks adjournment to allow the ‘narrow portion’ left in the settlement terms to be resolved. Though, Olanipekun (SAN) said he did not know anything about the settlement and have no business in the matter.

However, the presiding judge, Justice Dipeolu, after listening to all counsel, acceded to Ndigbe’s adjournment request and adjourned the matter to July 23, 2025, for report of settlement.

Facebook 0 Twitter/X 0 LinkedIn0 WhatsApp0 0Shares
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Sports

JUST IN: Manchester City Found Guilty of 114 Premier League Financial Charges

Published

on

JUST IN: Manchester City Found Guilty of 114 Premier League Financial Charges—-Manchester City have reportedly been found guilty of all but one of the 115 alleged Premier League financial breaches, with sanctions yet to be determined and the club expected to appeal.

Manchester City have reportedly been found guilty of 114 of the 115 alleged breaches of the Premier League’s financial regulations, bringing a major development to one of the longest-running financial cases in English football.

The reported verdict was delivered by an independent commission following a lengthy hearing into allegations dating back to the 2009-10 season. The Premier League originally charged City in February 2023 following a four-year investigation into the club’s financial affairs.

According to reports from The Athletic and The Times, the independent commission ruled against Manchester City on all but one of the 115 charges.

The allegations covered several areas, including claims that City failed to provide accurate financial information, failed to properly disclose payments to players and coaches, breached UEFA financial regulations and the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules, and failed to cooperate with the league’s investigation.

Verdict Yet to Be Publicly Released

Despite the reported outcome, the Premier League has not formally published the commission’s verdict.

A Premier League spokesperson told Reuters that the matter remains confidential and the league would not comment on the reported findings. Manchester City also indicated that the process is not yet complete.

City have consistently denied wrongdoing since the charges were brought and are expected to appeal the reported findings.

The club said the Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements still to be completed and subject to strict confidentiality.

What Were Manchester City Charged With?

The 115 charges relate primarily to alleged breaches between 2009 and 2018, while separate allegations concerned the club’s alleged failure to cooperate with the Premier League investigation.

Reports indicate that 54 of the charges relate to alleged failures to provide accurate financial information, while another 35 concern alleged failures to cooperate with the investigation.

Further allegations involved the reporting of player and manager compensation as well as alleged breaches of UEFA financial regulations and the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules.

The hearing before the three-person independent commission lasted around 12 weeks and concluded in December 2024. The verdict was then delayed for a prolonged period because of the complexity of the case.

Punishment Has Not Been Decided

Manchester City have not yet been handed a punishment.

The sanctions that could potentially be considered under Premier League rules include financial penalties and sporting sanctions, although the eventual punishment will depend on the commission’s findings and the next stages of the process.

The club’s expected appeal could further prolong the case.

For now, the reported verdict represents a dramatic development in a case that has followed Manchester City for more than three years and covers a period in which the club established itself as one of the dominant forces in English football.

Manchester City maintain their position that they have acted properly and have consistently defended themselves against the allegations.

With the verdict reportedly going against the club on 114 of the 115 charges, attention will now turn to the official publication of the commission’s decision, the sanctions, and Manchester City’s expected appeal.

Facebook 0 Twitter/X 0 LinkedIn0 WhatsApp0 0Shares
Continue Reading

Sports

BREAKING: Haaland Scores Controversial Goal as 10-Men Manchester City Defeat Manchester United at Old Trafford

Published

on

BREAKING: Haaland Scores Controversial Goal as 10-Men Manchester City Defeat Manchester United at Old Trafford—-Erling Haaland struck after a lengthy VAR review to hand 10-man Manchester City a dramatic 1-0 victory over Manchester United in a fiery Manchester derby.

Manchester City secured a dramatic 1-0 victory over Manchester United at Old Trafford on Sunday, with Erling Haaland’s controversial second-half goal settling a fiercely contested Manchester derby.

City were forced to play with 10 men for more than an hour after Phil Foden was sent off in the first half for kicking out at Manchester United captain Bruno Fernandes. Despite their numerical disadvantage, Enzo Maresca’s side remained disciplined and eventually found the breakthrough through Haaland.

The decisive moment arrived around the hour mark when Haaland found the net, only for the assistant referee to immediately raise the flag for offside.

However, after a lengthy VAR review, the decision was overturned and the goal was awarded. Replays showed that Patrick Dorgu’s outstretched foot had played Haaland onside, while Enzo Fernández’s position was deemed not to constitute interference with play.

The decision sparked furious reactions from the home supporters, with Manchester United players also questioning whether Fernández’s position had interfered with their ability to defend the move.

United were handed a major advantage by Foden’s dismissal but failed to capitalise on it. Marcus Rashford and Kobbie Mainoo both struck the woodwork as the hosts desperately searched for an equaliser.

Manchester City’s defence held firm during the closing stages, while goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma produced a crucial late save to deny Bryan Mbeumo and preserve the visitors’ clean sheet.

The victory was particularly impressive given City’s lengthy spell with 10 men and handed Maresca a huge win in his first Manchester derby as City manager.

For Haaland, the goal continued his remarkable record against Manchester United and proved enough to give City all three points in one of the most controversial derbies in recent years.

The result keeps Manchester City’s perfect Premier League start intact, with the champions moving onto 12 points from four matches, level with Arsenal at the top of the table but behind the Gunners on goal difference. Manchester United, meanwhile, remain on just four points after four matches.

Facebook 0 Twitter/X 0 LinkedIn0 WhatsApp0 0Shares
Continue Reading

Trending

Facebook 0 Twitter/X 0 LinkedIn0 WhatsApp0 0Shares