Connect with us
Court Orders Arrest of UBA Senior Executives

Osun LG Funds: Court Orders Arrest of UBA Senior Executives Over Alleged Unauthorised Accounts

More Videos

Published

on

Osun LG Funds: Court Orders Arrest of UBA Senior Executives Over Alleged Unauthorised Accounts—-An Osogbo Chief Magistrate Court has issued a bench warrant against United Bank for Africa (UBA) Plc and three of its senior executives over their alleged involvement in the opening and operation of unauthorised accounts used to manage local government funds in Osun State.

The court’s action follows allegations that the accounts were operated outside approved financial and administrative frameworks governing council finances.

The bench warrant was issued on Friday, January 30, 2026, following the failure of the bank and the affected executives to appear before the court in a case instituted by the Osun State Government through the Office of the Attorney General. The court subsequently adjourned further hearing in the matter to February 10, 2026.

The charges, filed under charge number MOS/601C/2025, stem from petitions by chairmen of local governments in the state, who alleged that unauthorised accounts were opened to receive and manage statutory allocations meant for the 30 local government councils in Osun State.

According to the prosecution, the accounts were allegedly opened and operated at UBA “to allow unauthorized persons to operate and maintain the accounts,” an action the state government said contravenes existing financial and administrative regulations governing local government funds.

Those listed in the charge alongside UBA Plc are the bank’s Group Managing Director, Mr. Oliver Alawuba; Group Legal Adviser, Mr. Billy Odura; and Deputy Managing Director, Mr. Chukwuma Nweke. The defendants are accused of allowing the opening and operation of what the state government described as “illegal accounts” for Osun State local governments.

The case is unfolding against the backdrop of a prolonged local government crisis in Osun State, following a disputed council election conducted at the tail end of the administration of former Governor Gboyega Oyetola. The election was later nullified by the Federal High Court sitting in Osogbo.

The Osun State Government has repeatedly maintained that the chairmen produced by the election, which was conducted under the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led administration, were sacked by the court and therefore lack legal standing to occupy council offices or exercise control over local government finances.

Reacting to the issuance of the bench warrant, the Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Oluomo Kolapo Alimi, said the matter “revolves around the control of local government funds.”

He stated that the Osun State Government’s position remains that the sacked APC chairmen “are not and should not in any way or manner lay claim to the legitimate occupation of all council areas in Osun State,” adding that the continued occupation of the councils by the opposition party was “illegitimate.”

Alimi expressed confidence in the judiciary, saying the government believes the court will “carry out its constitutionally assigned duties and responsibilities without fear or favour” as the case progresses.

The court subsequently fixed February 10, 2026, for further hearing in the matter, as legal proceedings continue over the control and administration of local government funds in the state.

The development marks a significant escalation in the ongoing political and legal dispute surrounding local government administration in Osun State.

On Wednesday, SaharaReporters reported that lawyers representing the All Progressives Congress (APC) failed to appear in court, prompting accusations by the state government that the opposition party is deliberately evading judicial scrutiny to prolong the local government crisis.

The suit, filed by the Osun State chapter of the APC at the Federal High Court in Osogbo, seeks judicial backing for what the party describes as a continuation of the tenure of its local government chairmen. However, when the matter came up for hearing on January 28, 2026, none of the party’s listed lawyers — including three Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) — was present in court.

The court subsequently adjourned the case to March 4, 2026.

Reacting to the development, the Osun State Government described the absence of APC lawyers as an intentional act aimed at frustrating the resolution of the prolonged local government imbroglio.

In a statement issued by the Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Oluomo Kolapo Alimi, the government accused the APC of running away from a case it had filed and has been citing as justification for its continued occupation of council secretariats.

Alimi said the party’s conduct confirmed its alleged strategy of delay. He stated, “It is in the public domain that, in order to carry on with their illegality, they claimed they filed a case at the Federal High Court in Osogbo for tenure elongation but today they ran away from the same case.”

He further accused the APC of misrepresenting the nature of the suit, noting that the party had alternated between calling it a request for “tenure elongation” and “tenure determination,” which he described as “clearly bizarre.”

There is a dispute around over N130billion local government funds which the Bola Tinubu’s administration has continued to hold on to.

Facebook 0 Twitter 0 LinkedIn WhatsApp 0Shares

Sports

DR Congo Stun Portugal with Hard-Fought Draw in FIFA World Cup Opener

Published

on

DR Congo Stun Portugal with Hard-Fought Draw in FIFA World Cup Opener—–European giants Portugal were forced to settle for a point after a resilient DR Congo side produced a spirited display in their opening Group K clash at the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Portugal entered the match as overwhelming favourites, boasting one of the most talented squads in the tournament and carrying expectations of a deep World Cup run. However, DR Congo delivered one of the standout performances of the opening round, battling their way to a hard-earned 1-1 draw and sending a message to the rest of Group K.

From the opening whistle, Portugal dominated possession and attempted to impose their trademark passing game. Midfielders controlled the tempo, circulating the ball patiently as they searched for openings in a well-organized Congolese defense.

Despite Portugal’s territorial dominance, DR Congo remained disciplined. The African side sat compactly, denying space between the lines and forcing Portugal into speculative efforts from distance. Whenever possession was regained, DR Congo transitioned quickly, using their pace and physicality to threaten on the counterattack.

Portugal eventually broke the deadlock after a sustained spell of pressure. The European giants carved open the Congolese defense with a swift attacking move, allowing their forwards to capitalize and put the Seleção ahead. The goal appeared to settle Portugal and many expected them to push on for a comfortable victory.

Instead, DR Congo responded magnificently.

Refusing to panic, the Leopards gradually grew into the game and began committing more bodies forward. Their persistence paid off when they found an equalizer, sparking wild celebrations among their supporters. The goal shifted momentum dramatically and exposed Portugal’s growing frustration.

The second half became increasingly tense as Portugal searched desperately for a winner. Chances came and went, with the Congolese goalkeeper producing several crucial interventions while defenders threw themselves into blocks to preserve the scoreline.

Cristiano Ronaldo remained at the center of Portugal’s attacking efforts, attempting to inspire his side through moments of individual brilliance. However, DR Congo’s defensive structure held firm, limiting clear-cut opportunities and frustrating the Portuguese captain throughout the contest.

As the clock ticked down, Portugal threw numbers forward in search of a decisive breakthrough. The pressure intensified in the closing stages, but DR Congo continued to defend heroically while still posing a threat on the counterattack.

When the final whistle sounded, the contrasting emotions were evident. Portuguese players looked disappointed after dropping points against a team they were expected to beat, while DR Congo celebrated a result that could prove crucial in their quest to reach the knockout rounds.

Facebook 0 Twitter 0 LinkedIn WhatsApp 0Shares
Continue Reading

World

Trump and Pezeshkian Finalize Historic Accord to End War and Restore Gulf Shipping

Published

on

Trump and Pezeshkian Finalize Historic Accord to End War and Restore Gulf Shipping—-Landmark U.S.-Iran agreement takes effect as both leaders formally endorse a 14-point framework aimed at ending months of conflict, restoring maritime trade, and launching broader diplomatic negotiations.

U.S. President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian have electronically signed the “Islamabad Memorandum,” a historic peace agreement designed to end the conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran while reopening the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Pakistani officials confirmed that the memorandum has entered into effect following the signatures of both leaders.

The agreement, brokered with significant mediation from Pakistan, establishes an immediate halt to military operations and lays out a framework for a broader settlement to be negotiated over the next 60 days. The memorandum also commits both sides to reopening the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy shipping routes, easing concerns over global oil supplies and maritime security.

According to details released by U.S. officials, the 14-point accord includes provisions addressing Iran’s nuclear activities, sanctions relief, maritime security, and economic reconstruction. Iran reportedly reaffirmed that it will not pursue nuclear weapons, while the United States agreed to begin a phased process tied to future negotiations and compliance measures.

The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is among the most consequential elements of the agreement. The waterway carries a significant share of the world’s oil and gas exports, and its disruption during the conflict contributed to volatility in global energy markets. Officials say commercial shipping will gradually resume under new security arrangements outlined in the memorandum.

While diplomats have hailed the accord as a major breakthrough, officials on all sides acknowledge that substantial challenges remain. The memorandum serves as an interim framework rather than a final peace treaty, with negotiators expected to meet in Switzerland to work toward a comprehensive and binding settlement.

Facebook 0 Twitter 0 LinkedIn WhatsApp 0Shares
Continue Reading

Trending

Facebook 0 Twitter 0 LinkedIn WhatsApp 0Shares